TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Agliato v. Norton

Joseph v. AGLIATO Et Al. v. Eric R. NORTON Et Al.

Agliato v. Norton, 632 A.2d 144 (Me. 1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 21, 1993
Judges
Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Clifford, Collins, Rudman, Dana
Citations
632 A.2d 1441993 Me. LEXIS 195

Opinion — Roberts

ROBERTS, Justice.

Joseph and Margaret Agliato sought to perfect their title to a parcel of lakefront property in Wesley. An unimproved part of the land was claimed by Vaughn and Georgeanne Wentworth. A part of the land containing a cabin built by the Agliatos was claimed by Eric and Barbara Norton. The Nortons appeal from a judgment entered after a jury-waived trial in the Superior Court (Washington County,' Archibald, AR.J.)

awarding compensation to the Aglia-tos for betterments to the Nortons’ land. The Agliatos cross-appeal from the same judgment in favor of the Nortons and the Wentworths on the Agliatos’ claim of title by adverse possession. We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

An award of compensation for better-ments will be upheld unless it is clearly erroneous.

Emerson v. Maine Rural Missions Ass’n, Inc., 560 A.2d 1 (Me.1989). The decision must be affirmed if there is any competent evidence in the record to support it.

Stowell v. Swift, 576 A.2d 204, 206 (Me.1990). We conclude that the trial judge’s decision to award compensation in the amount of $6,000 is supported by such evidence.

The Agliatos had the burden of proving the elements of adverse possession. The determination that they have failed to carry their burden will not be reversed unless the evidence compelled a contrary finding.

Gonthier v. Horne, 576 A.2d 745, 748 (Me.1990). In this case the factfinder was not compelled to find the evidence sufficient to support their claim. The Agliatos were unable to show that they and their predecessors occupied the property for the requisite twenty years.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1994: 11995: 11997: 11998: 119942026peak 1994 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Thompson v. Pendleton1997 ME 127, 697 A.2d 56
  2. Tang of the Sea, Inc. v. Bayley's Quality Seafoods, Inc.1998 ME 264, 721 A.2d 648
  3. Cates v. Smith636 A.2d 986 (Me. 1994)
  4. Harkins v. Fuller652 A.2d 90 (Me. 1995)

Most recent

  1. Tang of the Sea, Inc. v. Bayley's Quality Seafoods, Inc.1998 ME 264, 721 A.2d 648
  2. Thompson v. Pendleton1997 ME 127, 697 A.2d 56
  3. Harkins v. Fuller652 A.2d 90 (Me. 1995)
  4. Cates v. Smith636 A.2d 986 (Me. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Emerson v. Me. Rural Missions Ass'n, 560 A.2d 1 (Me. 1989) 23
Gonthier v. Horne, 576 A.2d 745 (Me. 1990) 15
Stowell v. Swift, 576 A.2d 204 (Me. 1990) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list