TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Albert A. Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation, W

Albert A. ARVIDSON Et Al., Appellants, v. REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellee. W. J. WHITEAKER Et Al., Appellants, v. REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellee

Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Co., a Corp., W, 236 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 17, 1956
Docket
No. 14734_1
Judges
Bone, Orr, Murphy
Citations
236 F.2d 224

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The above cases coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the findings of fact of the district court were not clearly erroneous, and that the judgments are sustained by substantial evidence, and that the conclusions of law of the district court were correctly drawn, The judgment is affirmed, upon the opinion of the district court in W.D. Wash.1954, 125 F.Supp. 481 ;

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 11972: 12014: 219572026peak 2014 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Co., 125 F. Supp. 481 (W.D. Wash. 1954) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list