TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Morris Trieber v. John. O. England, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Gayne Sales Co., Inc., a Corporation, Bakrupt

Morris TRIEBER, Appellant, v. John O. ENGLAND, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Gayne Sales Co., Inc., a Corporation, Bankrupt, Appellee

Trieber v. John. O. England, 237 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1957)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 14, 1957
Docket
No. 15134_1
Judges
Denman, Stephens, Hamley
Citations
237 F.2d 117

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Trieber objected to the summary jurisdiction of the bankruptcy referee to hear the trustee’s petition for a turnover order. After a hearing on only the question of jurisdiction, the referee overruled Trieber’s objection, and assumed jurisdiction to hear the petition on the merits. Trieber filed a petition in the district court to review the referee’s order. The trustee moved to dismiss this petition, on the ground that the order of the referee was interlocutory and not final. The district court granted the motion to dismiss, and remanded the cause to the referee for a hearing on the merits.

Trieber thereupon appealed to this court. The trustee has moved to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction. He argues that an interlocutory order made in a “controversy arising in proceedings in bankruptcy,” as distinguished from an order made in “proceedings in bankruptcy,” is not reviewable, citing 11 U.S.C.A. § 47 , sub. a. It is asserted that this is such an order.

We agree. The order was entered in connection with a dispute between the trustee and an adverse claimant, concerning the right and title to the bankrupt estate. It was therefore an order made in a controversy arising in proceedings in bankruptcy, as that term is used in 11 U.S.C.A. § 47 , sub. a. See In re Christ’s Church of the Golden Rule, 9 Cir., 172 F.2d 523 . The order is concededly interlocutory in nature. It follows that this court lacks jurisdiction to review such order. In re Christ’s Church of the Golden Rule, supra.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is ordered granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1960: 11976: 119602026peak 1960 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re Christ's Church of the Golden Rule, 172 F.2d 523 (9th Cir. 1949) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list