TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

A. B. Phillips, Executive Director, Employment Security Commission of Alaska v. Fidalgo Island Packing Co., Clara Wilson

A. B. PHILLIPS, Executive Director, Employment Security Commission of Alaska, Appellant, v. FIDALGO ISLAND PACKING CO., Appellee, Clara Wilson, Intervenor

A. B. Phillips, Exec. Dir., Emp. Sec. Comm'n of Alaska v. Fidalgo Island Packing Co., 238 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 10, 1956
Docket
No. 14505_1
Judges
Healy, Fee, Chambers
Citations
238 F.2d 23416 Alaska 338

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

In the petition for rehearing, appellant misreads the per curiam opinion of this Court. There was no intention in that opinion to controvert well established principles. Where an administrative agency or officer has been given jurisdiction over the subject matter of a field, the presumption of validity of the regulations and acts of such agency or officer applies. Here the jurisdiction of the old commission over the subject matter had expired by abolition of the agency. The delegated power to the Executive Director of the old commission expired when it went out of existence. The rulings may be explained upon principles of agency as well as upon grounds of lack of jurisdiction. If the new commission desired to delegate power to the Executive Director, it could not act before its creation and assumption of authority. His purported action in the interim between the expiration of his delegation of power by the old commission and the organization of the new commission was void, not voidable, because no body had jurisdiction of the subject matter at the time and he had no delegated authority to act in the premises. The fact that the acts abolishing one body and creating another were passed simultaneously is without significance. The only confusion apparent in this case is that of legislative policy and the application thereof by the administrative agencies which have been created. On the other hand, an emergency has obviously been prevented by federal legislation.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 31976: 11983: 119572026peak 1957 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list