TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Thelma Blevins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Thelma BLEVINS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Blevins v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 238 F.2d 621 (6th Cir. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 18, 1956
Docket
No. 12766_1
Judges
Simons, Martin, Stewart
Citations
238 F.2d 621

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This petition, filed by Thelma Blevins, for review of the decision of the Tax Court of the United States finding deficiencies in petitioner’s income tax and additions to tax for the years 1940 to 1951, inclusive, has been duly heard and considered upon the oral arguments and briefs of attorneys for the parties and upon the record in the case;

And it appearing that the findings of the Tax Court are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the conclusions of the Tax Court as to the applicable law were correctly drawn, as shown by the reasoning of the court in its opinion;

And it appearing further that, inasmuch as the petitioner filed no tax returns for the years involved, the statute of limitations does not bar the recovery of the tax deficiencies. Section 275(a), I.R.C. (1939), 26 U.S.C.A.;

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1963: 11964: 11967: 11992: 119632026peak 1963 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Flynn v. Commissioner40 T.C. 770 (Tax Ct. 1963)
  2. Rife v. Commissioner41 T.C. 732 (Tax Ct. 1964)
  3. O'Connor v. Commissioner1967 T.C. Memo. 174
  4. Toms v. Commissioner1992 T.C. Memo. 125

Most recent

  1. Toms v. Commissioner1992 T.C. Memo. 125
  2. O'Connor v. Commissioner1967 T.C. Memo. 174
  3. Rife v. Commissioner41 T.C. 732 (Tax Ct. 1964)
  4. Flynn v. Commissioner40 T.C. 770 (Tax Ct. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list