TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Bible Knowledge Association, Inc. v. Dumont Broadcasting Corporation

NATIONAL BIBLE KNOWLEDGE ASSOCIATION, Inc., Appellant, v. DUMONT BROADCASTING CORPORATION, Appellee

Nat'l Bible Knowledge Ass'n v. Dumont Broad. Corp., 239 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 29, 1956
Docket
No. 13430
Judges
Fahy, Danaher, Burger
Citations
239 F.2d 7499 U.S. App. D.C. 2541956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4133

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is from an order of the District Court denying plaintiff’s motion there for a preliminary injunction. The injunction was sought on the basis of a complaint that defendant, appellee, in essence was attempting unlawfully to cancel a contract under which it was televising certain programs of plaintiff. Damages also were prayed. On oral argument before us appellant’s counsel stated that the contract had expired, as also appears clearly from the record. He also represented that appellant asserts no claim of a present right to have its programs televised by appellee, under the contract or otherwise. Thus it appears that the appeal is moot and that any remaining controversy has to do-only with the question of damages, which has not been decided by the District Court. The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed as moot. In addition, the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the District Court rested its denial of the motion for a preliminary injunction will be set aside, and the case remanded for such further proceedings as may be appropriate. Cf. Amalgamated Ass’n, etc., Motor Coach Employees v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 340 U.S. 416 , 71 S.Ct. 373 , 95 L.Ed. 389 .

1

It is so ordered.

1

. The reason the findings of fact and conclusions of law are set aside is that we are unable to review them due to themootness of the appeal.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 11964: 11968: 119572026peak 1957 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Amalgamated Ass'n of St., Elec. Ry. & Motor Coach Employees of Am., Div. 998 v. Wis. Emp. Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 416 (1951) 46

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list