United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Company, Inc., and United Pacific Insurance Company
Subsequent history: rev'd, United States v. R. F. Ball Constr. Co., 355 U.S. 587 (1958). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion
239 F.2d 384 57-1 USTC P 9269
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. R. F. BALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., and United Pacific Insurance Company, Appellees.
No. 16276.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 26, 1956.
A. F. Prescott, George F. Lynch, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Russell B. Wine, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex.
Elmer J. Kelsey, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., John N. Stull, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Harman Parrott, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellant.
Richard U. Simon, Ft. Worth, Tex., Josh H. Groce, San Antonio, Tex., Eskridge, Groce & Hebdon, San Antonio, Tex., of counsel, for appellee.
Before CAMERON, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
The facts of this case are well recited and the controlling principles of law are well stated in the opinion of Judge Rice, R. F. Ball Construction Company v. Jacobs, D.C., 140 F.Supp. 60 . For the reasons there set forth the judgment appealed from is 2
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.