TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Elmer G. Overly and Mary H. Overly v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Elmer G. OVERLY and Mary H. Overly, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Overly v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 243 F.2d 576 (3d Cir. 1957)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: vacated sub nom. Whipple v. Comm'r, 373 U.S. 193 (1963). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 29, 1957
Docket
No. 12132
Judges
Maris, Kalodner, Staley
Citations
243 F.2d 57652 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 5941957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5092

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The decisive question in this case is whether the income received by one of the taxpayers by way of salary for his personal services was income from a “trade or business regularly carried on by the taxpayer” within the meaning of section 122(d) (5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 122 (d) (5), relating to the net operating loss deduction. The Tax Court held that it was such income and upheld the Commissioner’s computation of the taxpayers’ income tax liability for the year 1951 on that basis. In so doing the Court followed and applied the decision of our brethren of the Second Circuit in Folker v. Johnson, 1956, 230 F.2d 906 , in which this question was squarely raised and decided. We find ourselves in complete accord with the conclusions reached in that case and think it unnecessary to elaborate them here. It is sufficient to say that the decision under review must be affirmed upon the authority of that case and that to the extent that Hughes v. Commissioner, 10 Cir., 1930, 38 F.2d 755 , decides otherwise we think it wrongly decided and do not choose to follow it.

The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1958: 31959: 21961: 11963: 119582026peak 1958 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Folker v. Johnson, 230 F.2d 906 (2d Cir. 1956) 34
Hughes v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 38 F.2d 755 (10th Cir. 1930) 29

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list