Kelsey D. Bartlett v. Dr. Robert E. Weimer
Kelsey D. BARTLETT, Appellant, v. Dr. Robert E. WEIMER Et Al., Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appel-lees, and Kelsey D. Bartlett, appellant in propria persona, and the court being duly advised, Now therefore, It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the order of the district court sustaining a motion for an order quashing service of process upon appellees and dismissing the action as to them, be affirmed upon the authority of Marten v. Holbrook, C.C.N.D.Cal., *956 157 F. 716 ; Whittington v. Johnston, D.C., 102 F.Supp. 352 , affirmed, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 810 ; and Kenney v. Fox, 6 Cir., 232 F.2d 288 , relied upon by Judge Kloeb in his order sustaining appellees’ motion.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.