TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Van Waters & Rogers Inc.

In Re VAN WATERS & ROGERS INC., Et Al., Relators

In re Van Waters & Rogers Inc., 988 S.W.2d 740 (Tex. 1998)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 15, 1998
Docket
No. 98-0222
Judges
Hankinson
Citations
988 S.W.2d 74042 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 651998 Tex. LEXIS 1431998 WL 716944

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

In this mandamus proceeding, we are asked to review several issues relating to a November 20, 1997 trial court Order on Motion to Select Parties for Trial. These issues include an order abating all discovery except as to the twenty plaintiffs selected to proceed first to trial; an order allowing plaintiffs’ counsel to select the first group of trial plaintiffs; and the denial of relators’ motion to compel plaintiffs to further answer an interrogatory regarding causation of plaintiffs’ injuries.

We believe that the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider the abatement order in light of our recent opinion in In re Colonial Pipeline Co., 968 S.W.2d 938 (Tex.1998). If the trial court determines that discovery related to other plaintiffs should not be abated, then the trial court should also reconsider its denial of relators’ motion to compel interrogatory answers regarding causation.

Therefore, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice to relators again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its rulings.

Justice HANKINSON, did not participate in the decision.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 32 cases

View all citing references →
2000: 12003: 12004: 12007: 12009: 22013: 12015: 12023: 2420002026peak 2023 · 24

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Benevis, LLC, Dentistry of Brownsville, P.C., and Kool Smiles, P.C.No. 15-0547 (Tex. App.—Houston [15th Dist.] July 24, 2015)
  2. In re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.145 S.W.3d 203 (Tex. 2004)
  3. In re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.31 S.W.3d 413 (Tex. App.—Edinburg-Corpus Christi 2000)
  4. In re Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie134 S.W.3d 359 (Tex. App. 2003)
  5. In re Ford Motor CompanyNo. 03-08-00617-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 6, 2009)
  6. In re Ford Motor CompanyNo. 03-08-00617-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 6, 2009)

Most recent

  1. Ex Parte: David Cayetano Vazquez v. the State of TexasNo. 08-23-00196-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Dec. 12, 2023)
  2. Ex Parte: Juan Cortes-Fernandez v. the State of TexasNo. 08-23-00201-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Nov. 30, 2023)
  3. Ex Parte: Joan Sebastian Pena-Cortes v. the State of TexasNo. 08-23-00204-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Nov. 30, 2023)
  4. Ex Parte: Hector Recendis-Martinez v. the State of TexasNo. 08-23-00202-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Nov. 30, 2023)
  5. Ex Parte: German De Jesus Rodriguez Delgado v. the State of TexasNo. 08-23-00200-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Nov. 30, 2023)
  6. Ex Parte: Eduardo Frias-Gutierrez v. the State of TexasNo. 08-23-00203-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Nov. 30, 2023)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re Colonial Pipeline Co., 968 S.W.2d 938 (Tex. 1998) 336

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list