TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sanders v. State

Morris Sanders v. State

Sanders v. State, 312 S.W.2d 640 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 16, 1958
Docket
No. 29715
Judges
Morrison
Citations
312 S.W.2d 640166 Tex. Crim. 2931958 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 4589

Opinion — Morrison

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the possession of marijuana; the punishment, two years.

Officer Gray of the narcotics division of the Houston police force testified that on the night in question he received information from a credible source that a colored man named Morris, *294 wearing a checkered sport shirt, khaki pants and a dress cap, had marijuana in his possession and was walking on Elgin Street in the direction of Dowling Street; that he and his fellow officer proceeded immediately to Elgin Street, and there saw a colored male dressed in the manner described above; that as they shone a flashlight on him the appellant, who had a lighted cigarette which was smaller than an average cigarette (like marijuana cigarettes are rolled), wrapped it up in a chewing gum wrapper and put it in his hip pocket; that he asked the appellant his name and was told it was Morris Sanders. He stated that he then placed the appellant under arrest, searched him, and recovered the cigarette wrapped in the chewing gum wrapper.

It was shown by Chemist Crawford that the cigarette in question contained marijuana.

Appellant did not testify or offer any evidence in his behalf.

We overrule appellant’s contention that the arrest and search were unlawful. The credible information plus the unusual act of appellant were sufficient to lead the officers to believe that a felony was being committed in their presence and to authorize the arrest without a warrant.

The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1958: 41959: 21960: 31963: 21968: 12023: 119582026peak 1958 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Smith v. State437 S.W.2d 835 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968)
  2. Sikes v. State334 S.W.2d 440 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)
  3. McCall v. State322 S.W.2d 291 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
  4. Artell v. State372 S.W.2d 944 (Tex. Crim. App. 1963)
  5. Bridges v. State316 S.W.2d 757 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)
  6. Slaughter v. State314 S.W.2d 92 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)

Most recent

  1. DeWolff Boberg & Associates Inc v. ClarkNo. 3:22-cv-02489 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2023)
  2. Smith v. State437 S.W.2d 835 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968)
  3. Dominguiz v. State373 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1963)
  4. Artell v. State372 S.W.2d 944 (Tex. Crim. App. 1963)
  5. Sikes v. State334 S.W.2d 440 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)
  6. Leal v. State332 S.W.2d 729 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list