TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Glassroth v. Moore

Stephen R. GLASSROTH, Plaintiff, v. Roy S. MOORE, Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, Defendant; Melinda Maddox and Beverly Howard, Plaintiffs, v. Roy Moore, in His Official Capacity, Defendant

Glassroth v. Moore, 242 F. Supp. 2d 1067 (M.D. Ala. 2002)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: aff'd, Glassroth v. Moore, 347 F.3d 916 (11th Cir. 2003). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
District Court, M.D. Alabama · Federal District Courts
Decided
December 19, 2002
Docket
No. CIV.A.01-T-1268-N
Judges
Myron H. Thompson
Citations
242 F. Supp. 2d 10672002 WL 319386952002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25091

Opinion — Thompson

FINAL JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered November 18, 2002 (Doc. no. 138), and because defendant Roy S. Moore has declined to remove the Ten Commandments monument within the 30 days allowed for him to remove it voluntarily, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The motion for entry of permanent injunction, filed by plaintiffs on December 6, 2002 (Doc. no. 149), is granted.

(2) Defendant Roy S. Moore, his officers, agents, servants, and employees, and those persons in active concert or participation with him who receive actual notice of this injunction, be and they are each hereby ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from failing to remove, by no later than January 3, 2003, the Ten Commandments monument at issue in this litigation from the non-private areas of the Alabama State Judicial Building. In other words, this injunction does not reach areas maintained, in good faith, as private in the Judicial Building, such as a justice’s chambers.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to issue a writ of injunction.

Furthermore, the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant *1068 to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2002: 12003: 42004: 120022026peak 2003 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Glassroth v. Moore335 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2003)
  2. Glassroth v. Moore347 F.3d 916 (11th Cir. 2003)
  3. Moore v. JUDICIAL INQUIRY COM'N OF STATE891 So. 2d 848 (Ala. 2004)
  4. Simpson v. Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors292 F. Supp. 2d 805 (E.D. Va. 2003)
  5. Glassroth v. Moore242 F. Supp. 2d 1068 (M.D. Ala. 2002)
  6. Glassroth v. Moore275 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (M.D. Ala. 2003)

Most recent

  1. Moore v. JUDICIAL INQUIRY COM'N OF STATE891 So. 2d 848 (Ala. 2004)
  2. Simpson v. Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors292 F. Supp. 2d 805 (E.D. Va. 2003)
  3. Glassroth v. Moore275 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (M.D. Ala. 2003)
  4. Glassroth v. Moore347 F.3d 916 (11th Cir. 2003)
  5. Glassroth v. Moore335 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2003)
  6. Glassroth v. Moore242 F. Supp. 2d 1068 (M.D. Ala. 2002)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list