TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cargill v. the Frank Lowery

Cargill, Inc., Libelant-Appellee v. The Tug Frank A. Lowery and Frank A. Lowery, Claimant-Respondents, the Tug Ellen S. Bouchard, the Motor Tug Ellen S. Bouchard, Inc., and Bouchard Transportation Co., Inc., Claimant-Respondents-Appellants, and Inland Survey Bureau, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee

Cargill v. the Frank Lowery, 251 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 6, 1958
Docket
No. 24763
Citations
251 F.2d 845

Opinion

251 F.2d 845

CARGILL, Inc., Libelant-Appellee, v. THE Tug FRANK A. LOWERY and Frank A. Lowery, Claimant-Respondents, THE Tug ELLEN S. BOUCHARD, THE MOTOR TUG ELLEN S. BOUCHARD, Inc., and Bouchard Transportation Co., Inc., Claimant-Respondents-Appellants, and Inland Survey Bureau, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee.

No. 149, Docket 24763.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 13, 1958. Decided Feb. 6, 1958.

Atkins & Weymar, New York City (Horace T. Atkins, New York City, of counsel), for libelant-appellee.

Krisel, Beck & Taylor, New York City (Roman Beck, New York City, of counsel), and James F. Dalton, Albany, N.Y., for claimant-respondents-appellants.

Before MEDINA and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and GALSTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Affirmed on Judge Foley's opinion, filed June 4, 1957.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list