Morris Mac Schwebel v. Andrew D. Orrick, Harold C. Patterson, Earl F. Hastings, James C. Sargent
Morris Mac SCHWEBEL, Appellant, v. Andrew D. ORRICK, Harold C. Patterson, Earl F. Hastings, James C. Sargent, Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Appellant asked the District Court to enjoin the Securities and Exchange Commission from conducting a hearing to determine whether appellant should be prevented from continuing to practice before the Commission. Though we think the District Court was right in dismissing the complaint, we think the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedy and the court therefore erred in ruling on the Commission’s authority to disbar attorneys. Camp v. Herzog, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 373 , 190 F.2d 605 .
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 13 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell
- Touche Ross & Co. v. Sec
- Capitol Packing Co. v. United States
- Daniel M. Koden v. United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
- Murray A. Kivitz v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Most recent
- Colley v. James
- M.B.E. Inc. v. Minority Business Opportunity Commission
- Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
- Touche Ross & Co. v. Sec
- Touche Ross & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
- Daniel M. Koden v. United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.