TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Travelers Insurance Company v. Mrs. Clara Louise Sanford Stanley

TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Mrs. Clara Louise Sanford STANLEY Et Al., Appellees

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Clara Louise Sanford Stanley, 252 F.2d 115 (5th Cir. 1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 11, 1958
Docket
No. 16742
Judges
Borah, Tuttle, Cameron
Citations
252 F.2d 1151958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3661

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the plaintiffs in an action brought against Travelers Insurance Company under the Louisiana Direct Action Statute 1

for damages for the wrongful death of their minor son who died by electrocution at the swimming pool operated by defendant’s insured, Audubon Park Na-tatorium, Inc. The case was tried to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of Mrs. Stanley for $30,000 plus burial expenses of $917.94, 'and a verdict for Mr. Stanley in the amount of $500.

On this appeal, error is assigned on the failure of the court to direct a verdict for the defendant on motion made at the close of the plaintiffs’ testimony. However, defendant did not elect to stand on the motion, but introduced further evidence, and it is elemental that, when a defendant does not elect to stand upon a motion to direct at the close of plaintiff’s case and introduces testimony in defense, the motion is considered waived. Furthermore, in this case it is plain that plaintiffs had made a prima facie case sufficient to go to the jury.

Appellant’s second point is that the court erred in not granting a remittitur or in the alternative a new trial for the reason that the verdict in favor of Mrs. Stanley for $30,000 plus burial expenses was excessive as a matter of law. After a careful consideration of all the facts in this case, we are of the clear opinion that the verdict is not gross, monstrous, or inordinate, and therefore contrary to right reason, and that if it is excessive it is not so as a matter of law, but only as a matter of fact. This being so, this Court is without power to inquire into the amount of its excessiveness.

Affirmed.

1

. Louisiana Statutes Annotated — Revised Statutes of 1950, 22:655.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1959: 11969: 11970: 11971: 21973: 11988: 119592026peak 1971 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Barnes v. Dale530 So. 2d 770 (Ala. 1988)
  2. Fredonia Broadcasting Corporation, Inc. v. Rca Corporation481 F.2d 781 (5th Cir. 1973)
  3. Sylvester v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company237 So. 2d 431 (La. Ct. App. 1970)
  4. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Larry J. Andre267 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1959)
  5. Sylvester v. Liberty Mutual Insurance236 So. 2d 63 (La. Ct. App. 1969)
  6. Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. Sky Chefs, Inc.447 F.2d 1351 (5th Cir. 1971)

Most recent

  1. Barnes v. Dale530 So. 2d 770 (Ala. 1988)
  2. Fredonia Broadcasting Corporation, Inc. v. Rca Corporation481 F.2d 781 (5th Cir. 1973)
  3. Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. Sky Chefs, Inc.447 F.2d 1351 (5th Cir. 1971)
  4. Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. Sky Chefs, Inc.447 F.2d 1351 (5th Cir. 1971)
  5. Sylvester v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company237 So. 2d 431 (La. Ct. App. 1970)
  6. Sylvester v. Liberty Mutual Insurance236 So. 2d 63 (La. Ct. App. 1969)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list