TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Richard Vaughn Jenkins v. United States

Richard Vaughn JENKINS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Jenkins v. United States, 253 F.2d 710 (5th Cir. 1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 16, 1958
Docket
No. 16846
Judges
Hutcheson, Jones, Brown
Citations
253 F.2d 710

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Richard Vaughn Jenkins, purchased whiskey from retail liquor dealers in varying quantities ranging from twenty to over a hundred cases a week and these he sold during 1953, 1954, and 1955, to clubs in the dry counties in the Northern part of Georgia. He was indicted, convicted and sentenced for conspiracy to sell liquor at wholesale without the Federal wholesaler’s tax being paid as required by 26 U.S.C.A. § 5111 . From the judgment of conviction and sentence he appeals. We find no merit in any of his contentions.

The appellant would excuse the failure to pay the wholesaler’s tax by showing that his purchases were of tax-paid liquor from those authorized to sell and his sales were to those entitled to purchase. If sales of liquors are made in wholesale quantities without the payment of the required tax the law requiring such payment is violated no matter how many other laws may be observed. The acquittal of all of the other defendants charged with the appellant does not establish his innocence particularly since others who were not defendants were alleged to be conspirators. The payment in July, 1955, by the appellant of the tax for the preceding year and the succeeding year did not provide immunity from the penalties resulting from conduct pri- or to the time of payment. Neither in these nor in the other matters urged by the appellant do we find merit. The District Court’s judgment is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 21974: 11976: 11977: 12003: 12015: 119712026peak 1971 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. John T. Goodwin492 F.2d 1141 (5th Cir. 1974)
  2. United States v. Thomas348 F.3d 78 (5th Cir. 2003)
  3. United States v. William E. Klein, Jr.560 F.2d 1236 (5th Cir. 1977)
  4. United States v. Roe Harold Lance536 F.2d 1065 (5th Cir. 1976)
  5. United States v. Augustin Hernandez Cabrera, No. 71-1380 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir447 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1971)
  6. United States v. Richard Plato593 F. App'x 364 (5th Cir. 2015)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Richard Plato593 F. App'x 364 (5th Cir. 2015)
  2. United States v. Thomas348 F.3d 78 (5th Cir. 2003)
  3. United States v. William E. Klein, Jr.560 F.2d 1236 (5th Cir. 1977)
  4. United States v. Roe Harold Lance536 F.2d 1065 (5th Cir. 1976)
  5. United States v. John T. Goodwin492 F.2d 1141 (5th Cir. 1974)
  6. United States v. Augustin Hernandez Cabrera447 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list