TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gerald Voglino and P. Russell Willett, Owners and of Five (5) Coin-Operated Gaming Devices and Contents ($63.75) v. United States

Gerald VOGLINO and P. Russell Willett, Owners and Claimants of Five (5) Coinoperated Gaming Devices and Contents ($63.75), Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Voglino v. United States, 253 F.2d 794 (4th Cir. 1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 1, 1958
Docket
No. 7596
Judges
Parker, Sobeloff, Hoffman
Citations
253 F.2d 7941 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 22541958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5692

Opinion — Parker

PARKER, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment forfeiting five coin-operated gaming devices, which had been operated on premises leased by appellant Willett from appellant Voglino. The premises were acquired by Willett by lease from Voglino on June 12, 1956; and the five gaming devices, which were on the premises at that time, were allowed by Voglino, the owner, to remain on the premises under an agreement that he and Willett were to share equally in the profits and losses arising from their operation. Voglino had paid the tax imposed for the year ending June 30, 1956 by 26 U.S.C. § 4461 (2); but no tax was paid by Willett for the period from June 12 to June 30, 1956, during which he was the occupant of the premises and forbidden by 26 U.S.C. § 4901 to engage in the business without payment of the tax. The machines were ordered forfeited under 26 U.S.C. § 7302 on the ground that when possessed by Willett they were intended for use by him in a business in which he was forbidden to engage without paying the tax. We think that this decision was correct for reasons adequately stated in the opinion of the District Judge. See 154 F.Supp. 731 . The fact that Voglino had paid taxes for the year ending June 30 for carrying on a gaming business in which the machines were operated did not avail Willett; for the tax was imposed on the individual engaging in the business, not on the machines, and the payment of the tax by the individual was a condition precedent to his right to carry on the business. 26 U.S.C. § 4901 (a).

Appellants made three contentions : (1) that Willett was not liable for the tax for the month of June 1956 because he did not occupy the premises during the whole of that month; (2) that the intent required by the statute was not established; and (3) that the statute under which the tax was imposed *796 is unconstitutional. There is no merit in any of these contentions. Section 4901 (b) expressly provides that the tax shall be computed from the first day of the month in which liability for the tax commenced. The intent required by the statute, 26 U.S.C. § 7302 , is that the gaming devices be used in the business subject to tax upon which the tax has not been paid. As to constitutionality, there can be no question as to the power of Congress to impose a tax on the carrying on of the business in which the machines were operated. United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22 , 73 S.Ct. 510 , 97 L.Ed. 754 .

Affirmed.

Chief Judge PARKER, who prepared this opinion, died before the opinion was announced.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1958: 11965: 41966: 11972: 21977: 119582026peak 1965 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. One Bally Sun Valley Pinball MacHine340 F. Supp. 307 (W.D. La. 1972)
  2. United States v. Five (5) Coin-operated Gaming Devices246 F. Supp. 349 (W.D. Va. 1965)
  3. United States of America, Libelant- v. Deane Hill Country Club, Inc. And All of Its Members342 F.2d 794 (6th Cir. 1965)
  4. United States v. Four (4) Pinball MacHines429 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Haw. 1977)
  5. Suhomlin v. United States345 F. Supp. 650 (D. Maryland 1972)
  6. Chesapeake Vending Co. v. DeCarlo237 F. Supp. 554 (D. Maryland 1965)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Four (4) Pinball MacHines429 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Haw. 1977)
  2. Suhomlin v. United States345 F. Supp. 650 (D. Maryland 1972)
  3. United States v. One Bally Sun Valley Pinball MacHine340 F. Supp. 307 (W.D. La. 1972)
  4. United States v. United States currency in the amount of $2,813.37264 F. Supp. 394 (M.D. Penn. 1966)
  5. United States v. Five (5) Coin-Operated Gaming Devices248 F. Supp. 115 (W.D. Va. 1965)
  6. United States v. Five (5) Coin-operated Gaming Devices246 F. Supp. 349 (W.D. Va. 1965)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22 (1953) 220
United States v. Five (5) Coin-Operated Gaming Devices & Contents, 154 F. Supp. 731 (D. Maryland 1957) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list