TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Starr County v. Guerra

STARR COUNTY, Texas, Appellant, v. J. C. GUERRA, Appellee

Starr Cnty. v. Guerra, 282 S.W.2d 304 (Tex. App. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Texas · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 14, 1955
Docket
No. 12936
Judges
W. O. Murray
Citations
282 S.W.2d 3041955 Tex. App. LEXIS 2046

Opinion — Murray

W. O. MURRAY, Chief, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Starr County against J. C. Guerra in' the District Court of Starr County as Cause No. 3017, seeking a temporary injunction, and upon final hearing a permanent injunction, ordering the defendant to desist and refrain from attacking or questioning an agreed judgment in Cause No. 3002, styled Starr County, Texas v. J. C. Guerra, rendered in the District Court of Starr County on May 18, 1955.

The trial court sustained appellee’s plea, of “Another Action Pending” and dismissed the cause,, from . which judgment. Starr County has prosecuted this appeal.

Appellee’s plea of “Another Action Pending” was based upon the fact that on May 31, 1955, thirteen days after judgment had been rendered in Cause No. 3002,. appellant- filed ,a motion for a new trial, and therefore that cause was still pending in the District Court of Starr County. Rule 329-b,, Texas Rules of, Civil Procedure, subd. 1, provides that a motion for new trial must-be filed within ten days after the judgment is rendered., The filing of a motion for new trial on the thirteenth day after the rendition of judgment was a nullity and of no- *305 force or effect. Forrest v. Beynon, Tex.Civ.App., 179 S.W.2d 355 ; Rule 329-b, supra. There being no motion for a new trial filed .within the prescribed time, the judgment became final thirty days after it was rendered. Rule 329-b, T.R.C.P. Cause No. 3002 was not a pending cause when the plea of “Another Action Pending” was filed on July 7, 1955.

The trial court erred in sustaining appel-lee’s plea of “Another Action Pending” and dismissing this causé. Accordingly, the judgment will be reverséd and the cause remanded for further action not inconsistent with this opinion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1955: 11956: 11957: 21960: 11963: 11966: 11971: 11982: 119552026peak 1957 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Berger v. Greve303 S.W.2d 466 (Tex. App. 1957)
  2. Selman v. Ross302 S.W.2d 752 (Tex. App. 1957)
  3. Miller v. Esunas401 S.W.2d 150 (Tex. App. 1966)
  4. Starr County v. Laughlin283 S.W.2d 830 (Tex. App. 1955)
  5. Cathcart v. Childers296 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. App. 1956)
  6. Bernal v. Travelers Insurance Co.469 S.W.2d 641 (Tex. App. 1971)

Most recent

  1. Munson, Munson & Porter, P. C. v. Robinson634 S.W.2d 32 (Tex. App. 1982)
  2. Bernal v. Travelers Insurance Co.469 S.W.2d 641 (Tex. App. 1971)
  3. Miller v. Esunas401 S.W.2d 150 (Tex. App. 1966)
  4. Velasco Drainage District of BraZoria County v. Brock372 S.W.2d 567 (Tex. App. 1963)
  5. Ashburn v. Physicians Life & Accident Insurance Co. of America332 S.W.2d 451 (Tex. App. 1960)
  6. Selman v. Ross302 S.W.2d 752 (Tex. App. 1957)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Forrest v. Beynon, 179 S.W.2d 355 (Tex. App. 1944) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list