Spiers v. State
George Earl SPIERS, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
Opinion
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING BROWN, Commissioner.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted. Our prior PER CURIAM opinion is withdrawn.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault. The punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions under V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Sec. 12.42(d), was assessed at life imprisonment.
In support of the enhancement provisions of the indictment the State offered in evidence certified copies of two prior convictions in the State of Mississippi. One conviction was for burglary in cause number 2,658. The other was for assault with intent to commit murder in cause number 2,895. Although appellant admitted these two prior convictions, the burden was upon the State to prove that they were each final convictions. The record reveals that in the burglary conviction appellant’s sentence was suspended. There is no showing that this suspended sentence was ever revoked. Accordingly, there is no proof that the burglary conviction was a final conviction. Absent such proof such conviction cannot be used for enhancement.
Arbuckle v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 371 , 105 S.W.2d 219 ;
Fetters v. State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 282 , 1 S.W.2d 312 ;
Brittian v. State, 85 Tex.Cr.R. 491 , 214 S.W. 351 .
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Opinion approved by the Court.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that, to enhance the punishment of a felony offense, the State must prove that the prior felony was a "final" conviction)
-
(Showing suspendsd sentence was never revoked, and "absent proof of conviction cannot be used for enhancement")
Cited by 22 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.