TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Thomas Williams v. United States of America, Lindsey McDaniel v. United States

Thomas WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee; Lindsey McDANIEL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Thomas Williams v. United States of Am., Lindsey McDaniel v. United States, 255 F.2d 896 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 22, 1958
Docket
No. 14186_1
Judges
Fahy, Washington, Dan-Aher
Citations
255 F.2d 896103 U.S. App. D.C. 1441958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4271

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, together with one Jackie J. Floyd, were indicted for common law murder, murder in perpetration of a felony, and robbery. Floyd has not been tried because of his mental condition. Appellants were tried only on the counts for murder in the perpetration of a felony, and for robbery, the count charging premeditated murder having been dismissed as to them. Two trials by jury resulted in mistrials, the first because the jury was unable to agree on a verdict and the second because a juror was unable to complete the deliberations. A third trial followed before a district judge alone, trial by jury having been duly waived. The judge acquitted appellants of the murder charge and convicted them of robbery, as aiders and abettors rather than as principals. It is from the resulting judgments that they appeal.

1

Appellants question the admissibility of certain evidence, the sufficiency of *897 the evidence, and the validity of the robbery conviction on the ground of its alleged inconsistency with their acquittal of the charge of murder in the perpetration of the robbery. Upon consideration of these and all other questions raised we find no basis for reversal and the judgments are Affirmed.

1

. Appellants were tried together. They took separate appeals from the separate judgments, but the two eases were here consolidated for briefing and argument.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1964: 21965: 11966: 11967: 41968: 11970: 119642026peak 1967 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. James H. Harris v. United States370 F.2d 477 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  2. Thomas Williams v. United States335 F.2d 290 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
  3. Scott v. United States228 A.2d 637 (D.C. 1967)
  4. Albert Douglas Davis v. United States327 F.2d 301 (9th Cir. 1964)
  5. The People v. Wright242 N.E.2d 180 (Ill. 1968)
  6. State v. Warner237 A.2d 150 (Me. 1967)

Most recent

  1. People v. Christman61 Misc. 2d 1084 (1970)
  2. The People v. Wright242 N.E.2d 180 (Ill. 1968)
  3. State v. Warner237 A.2d 150 (Me. 1967)
  4. Frederick Elmo Thompson, Jr. v. United States382 F.2d 390 (9th Cir. 1967)
  5. State v. Carpenter150 N.W.2d 129 (Neb. 1967)
  6. Scott v. United States228 A.2d 637 (D.C. 1967)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list