Estate of W. Y. Brame, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
ESTATE OF W. Y. BRAME, Deceased, Et Al., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The Tax Court’s findings of fact and opinion reported at 25 T.C. 824 contain a careful analysis of the issues and of the contentions made by the taxpayers. A thorough consideration of the briefs and arguments in connection with the voluminous record and the many exhibits convinces us that there were no signifi *344 cant procedural errors, and that the Tax Court’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence, and certainly are not clearly erroneous. 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C.1954) 7482(a). We agree with the Tax Court’s opinion. To write more would serve no useful purpose. The decision of the Tax Court is correct, and it is Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 38 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Otsuki v. Commissioner
- Habersham-Bey v. Commissioner
- Haldane M. Plunkett v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Kenneth Poy Lee and Chow Joy Lee v. United States
- Nell La Compte Reaves, as of the Will of Jesse Ullman Reaves, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Ruidoso Racing Association, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.