TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Oran Johnson v. Nathan Mayo, as Custodian of the Florida State Prison

Oran JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Nathan MAYO, as Custodian of the Florida State Prison, Appellee

Oran Johnson v. Mayo, 256 F.2d 761 (5th Cir. 1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 30, 1958
Docket
No. 16834
Judges
Cameron, Jones, Brown
Citations
256 F.2d 7611958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4407

Opinion — Cameron

CAMERON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Oran Johnson, petitioner below, a prisoner in custody under a State Court sentence, sought in the court below habeas corpus relief therefrom. The District Judge held two hearings on the petition and denied it, granting appellant, however, leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but denying a certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S. C.A. § 2253. No application having been made to a member of this Court for a certificate of probable cause, this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

In an effort to be certain that appellant, who is serving a life sentence, should be given every possible chance to present his contentions, this Court requested a member of the Florida Bar of outstanding ability to present this appeal to us, and this was done by extended oral argument. In addition, the Attorney General of Florida has filed a brief painstakingly setting forth each of the questions raised by appellant, and answering each of said questions in a fair and unbiased manner.

*762 We have considered the record and the arguments of counsel as if they were placed before us upon an application for a certificate of probable cause. Cf. Franey v. State of Florida, 5 Cir., 1944, 211 F.2d 447 ; Henson v. Ellis, 5 Cir., 1954, 217 F.2d 134 ; Maulding v. Ellis, 5 Cir., 1954, 217 F.2d 134 ; and Atkins v. Ellis, 5 Cir., 1955, 227 F.2d 161 . Our consideration leads us to the conclusion that there is no merit in any of appellant’s contentions.

From the attitude of the representatives of the State of Florida in the presentation of the case to us, we are confident that the way has been, and will remain, open for appellant to avail himself of the provisions of the Florida law dealing with executive clemency. F.S.A. § 940.01 et seq.

None of the Judges of this Court being willing to issue a certificate of probable cause, the appeal is Dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 11968: 11972: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Franey v. Florida, 211 F.2d 447 (5th Cir. 1954) 6
Atkins v. O. B. Ellis, Gen. Manager of the Tex. Prison Sys., 227 F.2d 161 (5th Cir. 1955) 4
T. H. Henson v. O. B. Ellis, Gen. Manager, Tex. Prison Sys., 217 F.2d 134 (5th Cir. 1954) 2
Maulding v. O. B. Ellis, Gen. Manager, Tex. Prison Sys., 217 F.2d 134 (5th Cir. 1954) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list