TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Consolidated Electric Lamp Company v. Mitchell

Consolidted Electric Lamp Company v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Appellee-Intervenor

Consol. Elec. Lamp Co. v. Mitchell, 259 F.2d 189 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 18, 1958
Docket
No. 14142
Citations
259 F.2d 189104 U.S. App. D.C. 321958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5178

Opinion

259 F.2d 189 104 U.S.App.D.C. 32

CONSOLIDTED ELECTRIC LAMP COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. James P. MITCHELL, Secretary of Labor, Appellee, International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, Appellee-Intervenor.

No. 14142.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 20, 1958. Decided Sept. 18, 1958.

Mr. Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D.C., for appellants. Mr. Paul M. Rhodes, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellants.

Mr. Donald B. MacGuineas, Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub, Mr. Paul A. Sweeney, Attorney, Department of Justice, and Miss Bessie Margolin, Assistant Solicitor, United States Department of Labor, were on the brief, for appellee Mitchell.

Mr. Benjamin C. Sigal, Washington, D.C., entered an appearance for appellee-intervenor.

Before WASHIGTON, DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case, which is similar in nature to Mitchell v. Covington Mills, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 165 , 229 F.2d 506 , certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 1002 , 76 S.Ct. 546 , 100 L.Ed. 865 , rehearing denied 1956, 351 U.S. 934 , 76 S.Ct. 787 , 100 L.Ed. 1462 , involves an industry-wide wage determination under the Walsh-Healey Act, 41 U.S.C.A. 35(b), for the electric lamp industry. We think the principal issue here-- the validity of the determination-- is governed by the decision in Covington Mills, and we therefore uphold the determination, on the facts revealed by the record before us. We have considered all the points urged by appellants, but find no reversible error. The action of the District Court in granting summary judgment for the appellee Mitchell is therefore 2

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Mitchell v. Covington Mills, Inc., 229 F.2d 506 (D.C. Cir. 1955) 13
Barnes v. United States, 351 U.S. 933 (1956) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list