Insurance Agents' International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
INSURANCE AGENTS’ INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
Subsequent history: aff'd, Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ins. Agents' Int'l Union, 361 U.S. 477 (1960). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This case involves the same question of law as was presented in Textile Workers Union of America, C.I.O. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1955, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 35 , 227 F.2d 409 , certiorari granted 350 U.S. 1004 , 76 S.Ct. 650 , 100 L.Ed. 867 , certiorari vacated 1956, 352 U.S. 864 , 77 S.Ct. 90 , 1 L.Ed.2d 73 . Amicus attempts to distinguish this case from Textile Workers Union, but we find no critical difference between the two eases. On the authority of that case, the order of the Board here under review must be set aside. One panel of this court will not attempt to overrule a recent precedent set by another panel, even though one or more of its members may disagree with the ruling.
So ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 15 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents' International Union
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)
- United States v. Lawrence Daniel Caldwell v. Eros A. Timm, (Two Cases)
- De Rodulfa v. United States
- Balaji Doraiswamy v. Secretary of Labor
- Martin Rosendo-Ramirez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most recent
- Chen v. Ming Dow Ho
- Martin Rosendo-Ramirez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Central Transport, Incorporated, Central Cartage, Company and Big John Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board
- National Organization For Women v. Social Security Administration
- National Organization for Women v. Social Security Administration of the Department of Health & Human Services
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.