Jackson v. Cheatwood
B. H. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. Judy CHEATWOOD, Respondent
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this libel action, the proof establishing a qualified privilege of the defendant but standing silent as to the presence or absence of actual malice. On trial of the cause, it would be the burden of plaintiff to prove his allegation of actual malice. The Court of Civil Appeals has reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for trial, on the grounds that the defendant as movant had to negative the plaintiff’s cause of action. 442 S.W.2d 789 . Since the defendant, though enjoying a conditional privilege, would be liable if actuated by malice, it must fall to him to establish the absence of malice on his motion for summary judgment.
We approve this holding of the Court of Civil Appeals but since its opinion passes on matters not brought to this Court, the application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 30 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.