TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. Tolson

Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. Tolson, 136 U.S. 572 (1890)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 6, 1890
Docket
No. 532
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
136 U.S. 57210 S. Ct. 106334 L. Ed. 5391890 U.S. LEXIS 2229
Cited by 6

Opinion — Per Curiam

136 U.S. 572 (1890)

INLAND AND SEABOARD COASTING COMPANY

v.

TOLSON.

No. 532.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted December 23, 1889. Decided January 6, 1890. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

*578 Mr. Nathaniel Wilson for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Arthur A. Birney and Mr. Charles C. Cole for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. (January 6, 1890):

The motion to rescind the judgment of dismissal, entered November 4, 1889; to restore the cause to the docket; and to amend the writ of error herein by inserting therein, as plaintiffs in error, the names of Henry A. Willard, John W. Thompson, Samuel Norment and J.H. Baxter is Granted and case returned to the docket.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1899: 11904: 11908: 11914: 11928: 11929: 118992026peak 1899 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Copland v. Waldron133 F. 217 (9th Cir. 1904)
  2. Columbia River Packers' Ass'n v. McGowan217 F. 196 (9th Cir. 1914)
  3. American Baptist Home Mission Soc. v. Barnett26 F.2d 350 (2d Cir. 1928)
  4. Stinson v. New York Central Rd.165 N.E. 860 (Ohio Ct. App. 1929)
  5. Slater v. Hamacher15 App. D.C. 294 (D.C. Cir. 1899)
  6. Taylor v. Leesnitzer31 App. D.C. 92 (D.C. Cir. 1908)

Most recent

  1. Stinson v. New York Central Rd.165 N.E. 860 (Ohio Ct. App. 1929)
  2. American Baptist Home Mission Soc. v. Barnett26 F.2d 350 (2d Cir. 1928)
  3. Columbia River Packers' Ass'n v. McGowan217 F. 196 (9th Cir. 1914)
  4. Taylor v. Leesnitzer31 App. D.C. 92 (D.C. Cir. 1908)
  5. Copland v. Waldron133 F. 217 (9th Cir. 1904)
  6. Slater v. Hamacher15 App. D.C. 294 (D.C. Cir. 1899)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list