TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James A. Marshall v. United States

James A. MARSHALL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Marshall v. United States, 262 F.2d 456 (D.C. Cir. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 23, 1959
Docket
No. 14604
Judges
Danaher, Edgerton, Per Curiam, Prettyman
Citations
262 F.2d 456

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of a motion filed in the District Court under Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code. Appellant says his trial counsel failed to call a certain person as a witness and that his attorney, after the verdict, argued on behalf of both appellant and a co-defendant, also convicted, in respect to the sentence to be imposed. Despite the earnest and skillful presentation of appellant’s points by counsel appointed to represent him on appeal, we find no error.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1959: 119592026peak 1959 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Central States Drivers Council v. National Labor Relations Board267 F.2d 166 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

Most recent

  1. Central States Drivers Council v. National Labor Relations Board267 F.2d 166 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 262 F.2d 456 (D.C. Cir. 1958) 17

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list