TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

H. H. Vance v. United States of America, in Re One 1957 Buick Roadmaster Convertible, Etc

H. H. VANCE, Claimant, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. in Re ONE 1957 BUICK ROADMASTER CONVERTIBLE, Etc.

H. H. Vance v. United States, in Re One 1957 Buick Roadmaster Convertible, Etc, 262 F.2d 583 (6th Cir. 1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 11, 1958
Docket
No. 13544
Judges
Gourley, Martin, Miller, Per Curiam
Citations
262 F.2d 5831958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3456

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

After hearing the evidence in this case, the United States District Judge entered an order forfeiting a 1957 Buick Road-master Convertible Automobile to the use and benefit of the United States. The basis of the forfeiture was that the motor vehicle had been used to facilitate the unlawful dealing in a contraband narcotic, heroin.

The record discloses evidence to support a reasonable belief of the violation of the anti-narcotic laws such as to constitute probable cause for the filing of the libel of information in the cause. See Colonial Finance Co. v. United States of America, 6 Cir., 210 F.2d 531, 533 .

*584 The appellant failed to overcome the showing of probable cause made by the Government; and.there was substantial evidence to support the finding of the district court upon which its judgment was founded, the finding not being clearly erroneous.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1958: 11971: 11976: 119582026peak 1958 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. One 1973 Dodge Van, VIN B21AE3X095937, Bearing 1973 Michigan License 4037 EU416 F. Supp. 43 (E.D. Mich. 1976)
  2. United States v. One 1967 Buick Riviera439 F.2d 92 (9th Cir. 1971)
  3. H. H. Vance v. United States262 F.2d 583 (6th Cir. 1958)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Colonial Fin. Co. v. United States, 210 F.2d 531 (6th Cir. 1954) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list