TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury v. Juanita Kennedy Morgan, Juanita Kennedy Morgan v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury

Robert B. ANDERSON, Secretary of the Treasury, Appellant, v. Juanita Kennedy MORGAN, Appellee; Juanita Kennedy MORGAN, Appellant, v. Robert B. ANDERSON, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al., Appellees

Robert B. Anderson, Sec'y of the Treasury v. Juanita Kennedy Morgan, Juanita Kennedy Morgan v. Robert B. Anderson, Sec'y of the Treasury, 263 F.2d 903 (D.C. Cir. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 16, 1959
Docket
Nos. 14491, 14577
Judges
Fahy, Danaher, Bastian
Citations
263 F.2d 903

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

We consolidated these cases because of their close relationship and we dispose of them in one opinion. In No. 14491, in which appellee in the District Court sought to have set aside her separation as an employee in the Treasury Department the court directed appellant to place appellee on the retirement rolls ;as -of the date of her separation. The Secretary of the Treasury appealed. In No. 14577, the employee, appellee in No. 144.91, appeals from the same judgment.

In this court the appellant in No. 14491, one of appellees in No. 14577, calls attention to a certain incompatibility, in the context of these cases, between § 652 (a) under which the agency separation action was taken, and § 710 * , 5 U.S.C. (1952), the latter relating to retirement for disability. He appropriately suggests that the entire matter should be remanded to the District Court with instructions to remand the proceedings to the Treasury Department so that an involuntary application for retirement might be filed under § 710, which, if sustained, would render the litigation over the separation under § 652(a) moot. He also suggests that should the involuntary retirement application be disapproved by the Civil Service Commission then the agency should have leave to proceed further in accordance with the applicable statutes and Civil Service regulations.

Agreeing with these suggestions we shall vacate the judgment of the District Court and remand the cases to that court with directions to vacate its findings of fact and conclusions of law and remand the proceedings to the agency for vacation of the separation action and to permit appropriate proceedings to be instituted under § 710. In event such proceedings should not lead to retirement of the employee for disability the agency shall have the right on the administrative record previously made to proceed further in accordance with applicable statutes and Civil Service regulations.

It is so ordered.

* Now 5 U.S.C.A. § 2257 (a, b).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 11973: 21983: 11986: 11987: 11998: 119682026peak 1973 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Columbian Rope Co. v. West, Togo D.142 F.3d 1313 (D.C. Cir. 1998)
  2. Richard Weaver v. United Mine Workers of America, W492 F.2d 580 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  3. Seebach v. United States182 Ct. Cl. 342 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  4. Anna Masszonia v. Walter E. Washington476 F.2d 915 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  5. Robert D. Hammond v. Office of Personnel Management784 F.2d 392 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
  6. Sokoloff v. United States4 Cl. Ct. 140 (Ct. Cl. 1983)

Most recent

  1. Columbian Rope Co. v. West, Togo D.142 F.3d 1313 (D.C. Cir. 1998)
  2. National Post Office Mail Handlers v. United States Postal Service657 F. Supp. 295 (D. Colo. 1987)
  3. Robert D. Hammond v. Office of Personnel Management784 F.2d 392 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
  4. Sokoloff v. United States4 Cl. Ct. 140 (Ct. Cl. 1983)
  5. Richard Weaver v. United Mine Workers of America, W492 F.2d 580 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  6. Anna Masszonia v. Walter E. Washington476 F.2d 915 (D.C. Cir. 1973)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list