James G. Burley v. United States
James G. BURLEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is a companion case to Robinson v. United States, 10 Cir., 263 F.2d 911 . Appellant was convicted upon the first and fifth counts of the same indictment therein considered and held to be fatally defective. For the reasons stated in Robinson the judgment is reversed with instructions to dismiss the indictment.
Dissent
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
For the reasons indicated in my dissent in Robinson v. United States, 10 Cir., 263 F.2d 912 , I would affirm the conviction on Count One.
Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document
263 F.2d 912
James G. BURLEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 5971.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
January 26, 1959.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado; Alfred A. Arraj, Judge.
Irving P. Andrews, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
John S. Pfeiffer, Asst. U. S. Atty., for Dist. of Colo., Denver Colo. (Donald E. Kelley, U. S. Atty., for the Dist. of Colo., Denver, Colo., on the brief), for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS, MURRAH and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
This is a companion case to Robinson v. United States, 10 Cir., 263 F.2d 911 . Appellant was convicted upon the first and fifth counts of the same indictment therein considered and held to be fatally defective. For the reasons stated in Robinson the judgment is reversed with instructions to dismiss the indictment.
2
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge (dissenting).
3
For the reasons indicated in my dissent in Robinson v. United States, 10 Cir., 263 F.2d 912 , I would affirm the conviction on Count One.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.