TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Peter H. Green v. Secretary of the Navy and the Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, Camp Pendleton, California

Peter H. GREEN, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY and the Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, Camp Pendleton, California, Appellees

Green v. Sec'y of the Navy & the Commanding Gen., Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, Camp Pendleton, Cal., 264 F.2d 63 (9th Cir. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 17, 1959
Docket
No. 15946
Judges
Stephens, Healy, Chambers
Citations
264 F.2d 631959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4411

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Disposition of this case has been deferred awaiting final disposition of a court-martial conviction.

Green, who was not at the time a conscientious objector, enlisted in the United States Marine Corps for active duty. After about five months of service, he claims that he had become a conscientious objector and could not accept combat training, although he was willing to do non-combatant activities. Marine Corps Order No. 1306.16 provides for the assigning of conscientious objectors to non-combatant activities after interview by their commanding officer.

1

Green requested such an interview which was granted. The interviewing officer reported unfavorably to Green; and upon a review within the military regulations, Green’s claim was denied. He then filed a petition in the United States District Court for a writ of habeas corpus, or in the alternative for relief which would require his assignment to non-combatant activities. An Order to Show Cause was issued, and service was made on the commanding general of Camp Pendleton. After a hearing the Order to Show Cause was vacated, and the writ was denied. The present appeal is from this denial.

While this appeal was pending, Green was tried by a general court-martial and found guilty of various charges.

2

He was sentenced to a Bad Conduct Discharge after serving two years at hard non-combatant labor. Green appealed his court-martial conviction through the regular military channels of review. Because of Green’s status as a non-combatant prisoner, the appellee has moved for dismissal of the appeal on the grounds that the questions therein presented are moot.

On January 22, 1959, it was shown to this Court that the sentence was modified and affirmed on December 9, 1958, and further that Green has been discharged from the service and has accepted civilian status. It being clear that the appeal is moot, it is hereby dismissed.

1

. As a voluntary enlistee, Green does not come within the scope of Title 50 U.S. 0 .A.Appendix, § 456(j), which gives the local Selective Service Boards power to decide an inductee’s claim of conscientious objector status.

2

. The charges were as follows: unauthorized absence for three days; unauthorized possession of a liberty card; wrongfully publishing defamatory statements of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces; and publishing a statement disrespectful to a superior officer.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 61969: 11970: 219682026peak 1968 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Morbeto v. United States293 F. Supp. 313 (C.D. Cal. 1968)
  2. Hammond v. Lenfest398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1968)
  3. United States v. Noyd18 C.M.A. 483 (1969)
  4. Crane v. Hedrick284 F. Supp. 250 (N.D. Cal. 1968)
  5. Johnson v. Laird435 F.2d 493 (9th Cir. 1970)
  6. Lawrence James Minasian v. Capt. Paul R. Engle400 F.2d 137 (9th Cir. 1968)

Most recent

  1. No. 25383435 F.2d 493 (9th Cir. 1970)
  2. Johnson v. Laird435 F.2d 493 (9th Cir. 1970)
  3. United States v. Noyd18 C.M.A. 483 (1969)
  4. Morbeto v. United States293 F. Supp. 313 (C.D. Cal. 1968)
  5. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1968)
  6. No. 461398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1968)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list