TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Frost-Arnett Company v. Tobin, Secretary of Labor

FROST-ARNETT COMPANY, Appellant, v. TOBIN, Secretary of Labor, Appellee

Frost-Arnett Co. v. Tobin, Sec'y of Labor, 264 F.2d 246 (6th Cir. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 23, 1959
Docket
No. 13616_1
Judges
Martin, Allen, Miller
Citations
264 F.2d 2461959 U.S. App. LEXIS 493836 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 65,282

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This case has been heard and considered upon the oral arguments and printed briefs, with appendices, of the attorneys for the contending parties and upon the record in the ease;

And it appearing that the findings of fact of the district court are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous and that the conclusions of .law of District Judge Boyd are correctly drawn;

The order of the district court is affirmed, wherein it is directed that, in order to purge itself of contempt, the *247 respondent-appellant pay to the petitioner-appellee the sum of $20,309.14, being the amount equal to that for overtime compensation due the named employees of the respondent-appellant;

And the further order of the court is affirmed, wherein it is directed that the appellant pay to the appellee a compensatory fine of $2,141, to reimburse the petitioner-appellee in part for his reasonable costs and necessary expenses in the investigation of respondent-appellant’s operations and in the prosecution of this civil contempt action.

The order of the district court is in all things affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1964: 21967: 11968: 11980: 11981: 119642026peak 1964 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Research Electronics & Devices Co. v. Neptune Meter Co. & Elec. Signal Co., 264 F.2d 246 (2d Cir. 1959) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list