TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States of America ex rel. Anfield Bowers v. Edward M. Fay, Warden, Green Haven Prison and People of the State of New York

United States ex rel. Anfield Bowers v. Edward M. Fay,, Green Haven Prison & People of the State of N.Y., 266 F.2d 824 (2d Cir. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 28, 1959
Docket
No. 25354
Citations
266 F.2d 8241959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3965

Opinion

266 F.2d 824

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Anfield BOWERS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Edward M. FAY, Warden, Green Haven Prison and People of the State of New York, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 235, Docket 25354.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 6, 1959. Decided April 28, 1959.

Joseph D. Tekulsky, New York City (Frederick B. Boyden, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner-appellee.

George K. Bernstein, Asst. Atty. Gen. of the State of New York (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., Paxton Blair, Sol. Gen., Albany, N.Y., Harold Borgwald and Allan N. Smiley, Asst. Attys. Gen., State of New York, on the brief), for respondents-appellants.

Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion to dismiss as moot is denied, Judge Hincks dissenting.

2

On the merits, the Attorney General of the State of New York in behalf of the appellants questions controverted issues of fact found against the appellants by Judge Weinfeld. We think the findings sufficiently supported by the evidence: certainly they were not clearly erroneous.

3

On the opinion below, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1958, 171 F.Supp. 558 , the judgment is affirmed. 1 1

We wish to thank Messrs. Tekulsky and Boyden for their able representation of Bowers both the and below

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1960: 11962: 119602026peak 1960 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
People ex rel. Bowers v. Fay, 171 F. Supp. 558 (S.D.N.Y. 1958) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list