TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. James Santore, Peter Casella. Peter Casella

UNITED STATES of America v. James SANTORE, Peter Casella. Peter Casella, Appellant

United States v. Santore, 270 F.2d 503 (3d Cir. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 12, 1959
Docket
No. 12852_1
Judges
Goodrich, Staley, Hastie
Citations
270 F.2d 503

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of violation of the anti-narcotics laws. He presented no evidence at his trial. A number of matters have been urged as a basis for reversal. We have examined and considered all the points raised and find no error of which the defendant can justifiably complain.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1969: 11971: 119692026peak 1969 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Peter Casella v. United States449 F.2d 277 (3d Cir. 1971)
  2. Casella v. United States304 F. Supp. 756 (D.N.J. 1969)

Most recent

  1. Peter Casella v. United States449 F.2d 277 (3d Cir. 1971)
  2. Casella v. United States304 F. Supp. 756 (D.N.J. 1969)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list