Joseph Lorensen v. Sinclair Refining Company
Joseph LORENSEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal in an action under the Jones Act, the evidence of record was adequate to show an injury to plaintiff’s foot from slipping on oil on a ladder in the engine room of defendant’s tanker while at sea; it also showed suffering from burns incurred in the medical treatment had as a consequence of the injury. While the resulting verdict was substantia] in its allowance for pain and suffering, the trial court did not find it excessive and there is no ground for us to interfere. The judge did not err in admitting in evidence the hospital records containing a history of treatment and including a statement from the plaintiff as to how the injury occurred, Terrasi v. South Atlantic Lines, 2 Cir., 226 F.2d 823 , certiorari denied 350 U.S. 988 , 76 S.Ct. 475 , 100 L.Ed. 855 ; Tucker v. Loew’s Theatre & Realty Corp., 2 Cir., 149 F.2d 677 ; moreover, the statement appears to be quite colorless against the facts otherwise proven. The evidence, including the hospital records, also shows outpatient treatment supporting the award of maintenance. Moyle v. National Petroleum Transport Corp., 2 Cir., 150 F.2d 840 .
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.