Edward O. Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Incorporated, and William R. Schmitz
Edward O. MUELLER, Plaintiff, v. RAYON CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED, and William R. Schmitz, Defendants
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The petition to vacate our order of August 28, 1959, is denied by the court sitting en bcmc.
Upon reconsideration we find that the application for leave to appeal was timely inasmuch as it was made to us within 10 days of the order of the district judge that contained the 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) statement. Because in our judgment the grant of leave to appeal will not fulfill the purpose expressed in the statute, we, in our discretion, adhere to our previous decision denying leave to appeal.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.