TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jackson Tile Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

JACKSON TILE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent

Jackson Tile Mfg. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 272 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 4, 1959
Docket
No. 17590_1
Judges
Rives, Brown, Wisdom
Citations
272 F.2d 18145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 22391959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4672

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the Court on the petition of Jackson Tile Manufacturing Company to review and set aside a cease and desist order of the National Labor Relations Board following proceedings under Section 10 of the National Labor Relations Act. 61 Stat. 136 , 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.

The Board found that the Jackson Tile Manufacturing Company violated Section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.) by resorting to an informer system, surveillance of union meetings, interrogation of employees, and other forms of coercion designed to prevent the employees from exercising the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act; that it violated Section 8(a) (1) by discharging a supervisor who became reluctant to commit further unfair labor practices; and that it violated Section 8(a) (3) and 8(a) (1) by discriminatorily discharging four employees because of their organizing activities for the Union. 122 NLRB No. 94 . The Board requests enforcement of its order.

The only issues presented by this appeal are factual ones. We have carefully reviewed the record as a whole and find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings that the Company violated Section 8(a) (1) and (3) of the Act. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 1951, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; N. L. R. B. v. Birmingham Publishing Company, 5 Cir., *182 1958, 262 F.2d 2 ; N. L. R. B. v. Coats & Clark, Inc., 5 Cir., 1956, 231 F.2d 567 . The Company’s petition to review and set aside the order is denied.

Enforcement of the order of the Board is granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1960: 11966: 11967: 21968: 21969: 21972: 11981: 219602026peak 1967 · 2

Most recent

  1. Teamsters Local 115, A/w International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Haddon House Food Products, Inc. And Flavor Delight, Inc.640 F.2d 392 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  2. Teamsters Local 115 v. National Labor Relations Board640 F.2d 392 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 925, Aflcio, and Its Business Manager, H. B. Roberts460 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1972)
  4. J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board417 F.2d 533 (5th Cir. 1969)
  5. J. P. Stevens & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board417 F.2d 533 (5th Cir. 1969)
  6. J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, and Textile Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio (Tow Cases)406 F.2d 1017 (4th Cir. 1968)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474 (1951) 7,362
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Birmingham Publ'g Co., 262 F.2d 2 (5th Cir. 1959) 70
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Coats & Clark, Inc. (Acworth Plant), 231 F.2d 567 (5th Cir. 1956) 47

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list