TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. MacKneish

National Labor Relations Board v. Frank MacKneish Industrial Fabricating, Inc., Industrial & Foundry Sales, Inc., Unified Industries, Inc., Pressed Steel Flasks, Inc., and Paragon Industries, Inc.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. MacKneish, 272 F.2d 184 (6th Cir. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 9, 1959
Docket
No. 13796
Citations
272 F.2d 18445 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2137

Opinion

272 F.2d 184

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Frank MACKNEISH, Industrial Fabricating, Inc., Industrial & Foundry Sales, Inc., Unified Industries, Inc., Pressed Steel Flasks, Inc., and Paragon Industries, Inc., Respondents.

No. 13796.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

November 9, 1959.

Thomas J. McDermott, Washington, D. C., argued by William Avrutis, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

David Colman, Detroit, Mich., Joseph V. Wilcox, Albion, Mich., argued by David Colman, Detroit, Mich., for respondent.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and CECIL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The National Labor Relations Board found that respondents, in this case, by lockout, permanent shutdown, transfer of operations, and refusal to negotiate with the Union involved, concerning grievances, had violated Section 8(a) (5) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158 (a) (1, 3, 5); and that respondents Mackneish and Industrial Fabricating, Inc., had, by discrimination, failed to recall three employees, and had discharged two other employees in violation of Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act.

2

The testimony, introduced on behalf of the opposing parties, was in conflict. The issue is essentially one of fact; and determination of the facts, and the inferences to be drawn therefrom are for the Board. A review of the copious record discloses that the Board's findings were supported by substantial evidence on the record, considered as a whole.

3

The petition of the Board for enforcement of its order is, accordingly, granted, and a decree enforcing the order will, therefore, be granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list