TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. Paul A. Mcginley

Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. Paul A. McGinley District Attorney, County of Lehigh, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Retailers' Association, Amicus Curiae

Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. Mcginley, 273 F.2d 954 (3d Cir. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 23, 1959
Docket
No. 13096
Citations
273 F.2d 9541959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4643

Opinion

273 F.2d 954

TWO GUYS FROM HARRISON-ALLENTOWN, INC., Appellant v. Paul A. McGINLEY, District Attorney, County of Lehigh, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Retailers' Association, Amicus Curiae.

No. 13096.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Heard December 9, 1959.

Decided December 23, 1959.

Harold E. Kohn, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Harry J. Rubin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

W. James MacIntosh, Philadelphia, Pa., for amicus curiae.

Before GOODRICH and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The plaintiffs in this case have taken the position that they may appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States from an adverse decision by a three-judge court on the issue of the constitutionality of the statute and simultaneously appeal to the Court of Appeals on the issue of discriminatory enforcement of the statute. We think there is no basis for the allowance of a split appeal in this fashion. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal to this Court for want of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1253 , 1291.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1961: 11967: 119612026peak 1961 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Application of Rudolf Wiechert370 F.2d 927 (C.C.P.A. 1967)
  2. Wolf v. Boyd287 F.2d 520 (9th Cir. 1961)

Most recent

  1. Application of Rudolf Wiechert370 F.2d 927 (C.C.P.A. 1967)
  2. Wolf v. Boyd287 F.2d 520 (9th Cir. 1961)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list