Ernest McDonald v. United States
Ernest McDONALD, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was indicted for first degree murder and convicted of second degree murder. One Davis shot and killed one Jenkins. Testimony regarding appellant’s participation was in dispute. There was evidence that appellant and Davis engaged in a violent scuffle with Jenkins, and that after Davis had fired one shot appellant held Jenkins while Davis fired another.
The court did not charge the jury on the presumption of innocence. This was error. Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 452 , 15 S.Ct. 394 , 39 L.Ed. 481 ; Agnew v. United States, 165 U.S. 36, 51-52 , 17 S.Ct. 235 , 41 L.Ed. 624 . The charge on reasonable doubt did not dispense with the necessity of charging on burden of proof. The court did not define “malice aforethought” which is an element of second degree murder. D.C. Code (1951) § 22-2403. There was no charge on involuntary manslaughter. Trial counsel, who was not appellant’s present counsel, did not request these changes, but we think their omission was plain error. It follows that appellant’s conviction must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.