TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sara Slack v. Atlantic White Tower System, Inc.

Sara SLACK, Appellant, v. ATLANTIC WHITE TOWER SYSTEM, INC., Appellee

Slack v. Atl. White Tower Sys., Inc., 284 F.2d 746 (4th Cir. 1960)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 27, 1960
Docket
No. 8096_1
Judges
Sobeloff, Haynsworth, Boreman
Citations
284 F.2d 746

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This case involves the same issue as Williams v. Howard Johnson’s Restaurant, 4 Cir., 1959, 268 F.2d 845 . Here, the plaintiff, a Negro newspaper reporter, was travelling by automobile from Washington, D. C., to New York City. While passing through Baltimore, she stopped at the defendant’s restaurant located along U. S. Route 40 in that city. She was there refused service because of her race. As a result, she brought this suit in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, seeking a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. The District Court dismissed her complaint upon the authority of the Williams case, supra, and this appeal follows. See Slack v. Atlantic White Tower System, Inc., D.C.D.Md.1960, 181 F.Supp. 124 .

The only question that need be considered now is what effect, if any, does the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Boynton v. Virginia, 1960, 81 S.Ct. 182 , have upon the holding of the Williams case. In Boynton, the Court held that a restaurant, connected with an interstate bus terminal, may not under the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., discriminate against members of the public because of race. There, the Court’s opinion deliberately stated:

“We are not holding that every time a bus stops at a wholly independent roadside restaurant the Interstate Commerce Act requires that restaurant service be supplied in harmony with the provisions of that Act.” 81 S.Ct. at page 188 .

Since the Supreme Court has thus expressly refrained from ruling upon this issue, Williams v. Howard Johnson’s Restaurant, supra, dictates affirmance here.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1961: 31962: 11963: 11964: 21969: 11970: 219612026peak 1961 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.398 U.S. 144 (1970)
  2. Henderson v. Trailway Bus Company194 F. Supp. 423 (E.D. Va. 1961)
  3. Seidenberg v. McSorleys' Old Ale House, Inc.308 F. Supp. 1253 (S.D.N.Y. 1969)
  4. Seidenberg v. McSorleys' Old Ale House, Inc.317 F. Supp. 593 (S.D.N.Y. 1970)
  5. State v. Goldfinch132 So. 2d 860 (La. 1961)
  6. Randolph v. Commonwealth119 S.E.2d 817 (Va. 1961)

Most recent

  1. Seidenberg v. McSorleys' Old Ale House, Inc.317 F. Supp. 593 (S.D.N.Y. 1970)
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.398 U.S. 144 (1970)
  3. Seidenberg v. McSorleys' Old Ale House, Inc.308 F. Supp. 1253 (S.D.N.Y. 1969)
  4. Bruce Baines v. City of Damville, Virginia, the Rev337 F.2d 579 (4th Cir. 1964)
  5. Baines v. City of Danville, Virginia337 F.2d 579 (4th Cir. 1964)
  6. Eaton v. Grubbs216 F. Supp. 465 (E.D.N.C. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960) 76
Charles E. Williams v. Howard Johnson's Rest., Russell v. Keys & Mary Barnes, 268 F.2d 845 (4th Cir. 1959) 46
Slack v. Atl. White Tower Sys., Inc., 181 F. Supp. 124 (D. Maryland 1960) 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list