TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Twenty Four Hour Fuel Oil Corp. v. United States

TWENTY FOUR HOUR FUEL OIL CORP., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Et Al., Defendants

Twenty Four Hour Fuel Oil Corp. v. United States, 47 F. Supp. 2d 1103 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, E.D. New York · Federal District Courts
Decided
May 17, 1999
Docket
No. 1:98-cv-06141
Judges
Glasser
Citations
47 F. Supp. 2d 11031999 WL 414242

Opinion — Glasser

ORDER VACATING ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DISMISSING ACTION GLASSER, District Judge.

The above-titled action came before the Court upon the motion of the defendants to alter or amend the Order of February 23, 1999, imposing a preliminary injunction, and the Court, having read the papers in support of and in opposition to the motion, having heard the arguments of counsel for the parties, having considered the representation that the District Director of Internal Revenue has directed that plaintiffs claims be re-examined by a new team of excise tax agents, and that the United States will voluntarily refrain (in the absence of a determination of jeopardy) from collection of the assessed penalty by any new or presently outstanding IRS levies until the Internal Revenue Service has sent notice to plaintiff that its claims for the first and second quarters of 1997 and the months of July, August and September of 1997 have been re-examined, and the plaintiff has been afforded such further administrative review, if any, to which it is entitled under any provision of the Internal Revenue Code; and it is HEREBY ORDERED'that the motion of the defendants to alter or amend the Order of February 23, 1999, is GRANTED and that Order is VACATED; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, there having been no showing of irreparable harm, the above-titled action is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2005: 120052026peak 2005 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Samuel Yakobowicz427 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 2005)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Samuel Yakobowicz427 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 2005)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. McDougal, 47 F. Supp. 2d 1103 (E.D. Ark. 1999) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list