TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Byram Concretanks, Inc. v. Honorable Thomas F. Meaney

BYRAM CONCRETANKS, INC., Petitioner v. Honorable Thomas F. MEANEY, Respondent

Byram Concretanks, Inc. v. Meaney, 286 F.2d 170 (3d Cir. 1961)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 19, 1961
Docket
No. 13483
Judges
Forman, Goodrich, McLAUGHLIN, Per Curiam
Citations
286 F.2d 1704 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 5821961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5522

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for mandamus brought against one of the district *171 judges for the District of New Jersey. The allegation complains that the district judge unduly restricted the applicant in his interrogatories in a pending litigation and that he acted contrary to what one of his fellow judges had ordered on the same point. We think that this is not a proper case for mandamus. TCF Film Corp. v. Gourley, 3 Cir., 1957, 240 F.2d 711 . This Court has said many times that mandamus is not to be taken as a substitute for appeal. E. g., Green v. Murphy, 3 Cir., 1958, 259 F.2d 591 . The district judge was acting in a ease which was before him and the action he took was within his authority. If he was wrong the error can be corrected on appeal. The petition will be denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1963: 11973: 11979: 119632026peak 1963 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. John J. Donnelly v. Honorable Barrington D. Parker486 F.2d 402 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  2. Duncan v. Honorable Theis613 F.2d 305 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1979)
  3. Byram Concretanks, Inc. v. Warren Concrete Products Co. Of N. J.323 F.2d 994 (3d Cir. 1963)

Most recent

  1. Duncan v. Honorable Theis613 F.2d 305 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1979)
  2. John J. Donnelly v. Honorable Barrington D. Parker486 F.2d 402 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  3. Byram Concretanks, Inc. v. Warren Concrete Products Co. Of N. J.323 F.2d 994 (3d Cir. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Green v. Murphy, 259 F.2d 591 (3d Cir. 1958) 61
Tcf Film Corp. v. Gourley, 240 F.2d 711 (3d Cir. 1957) 42

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list