Caroline Friedman v. Violetta Rose Phillips and Joseph Sidney Tompkins, Jr.
Caroline FRIEDMAN, Appellant, v. Violetta Rose PHILLIPS and Joseph Sidney Tompkins, Jr., Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM;
A jury in the District Court awarded appellant a verdict of $2500 for personal injuries received. Appellant seeks a new trial on the issue of damages only. There was a conflict in evidence as to the nature, degree and source of injuries alleged.
In our view the issues were properly submitted to the jury with adequate instructions and there were no errors which warrant our disturbing the verdict.
The judgment of the District Court is Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Moses-Ecco Company, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Corporation, Roscoe-Ajax Corporation v. Charles Detwiler
- Agnes Rodenbur v. Helen J. Kaufmann
- Powers v. Coates
- Jerry Maiatico v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.
- Aleotti v. Whitaker Bros. Business MacHines, Inc.
- General Heating Engineering Company, Inc. v. District of Columbia
Most recent
- Aleotti v. Whitaker Bros. Business MacHines, Inc.
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. A-T-O, Inc.
- Harry H. Bland v. L'Enfant Plaza North, Inc
- Bland v. L'Enfant Plaza North, Inc.
- Precisionware, Inc. v. Madison County Tobacco Warehouse, Inc., Madison County Tobacco Warehouse, Inc. v. Precisionware, Inc.
- Powers v. Coates
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.