TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Paul F. Myers and Dora Jane Myers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Estate of Charles W

Paul F. Myers and Dora Jane Myers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Estate of Charles W. Myers, Deceased, Paul F. Myers, Administrator, and Blanche C. Myers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Myers v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Estate of Charles W, 287 F.2d 400 (6th Cir. 1961)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 22, 1961
Docket
No. 14277
Citations
287 F.2d 4007 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7811961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5264

Opinion

287 F.2d 400

Paul F. MYERS and Dora Jane Myers, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. ESTATE of Charles W. MYERS, Deceased, Paul F. Myers, Administrator, and Blanche C. Myers, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 14276.

No. 14277.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

February 22, 1961.

Charles Higby Smith, Waverly, Ohio, for petitioners.

Charles B. E. Freeman, Washington, D. C. (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, A. F. Prescott, Charles B. E. Freeman, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

1

Before SIMONS, Senior Judge, O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and THORNTON, District Judge.

ORDER.

2

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised.

3

The determination of the Tax Court that the petitioners realized ordinary income in 1954 when they repossessed real estate (which they had sold in 1952 after owning the same for more than six months) under mutual agreement with the vendee that the contract of sale was not to be carried out, and that they were to retain that part of the purchase price which had already been paid them, is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Norman O. Tietjens of the Tax Court of the United States. T. C. Memo-1959-231, December 11, 1959.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list