TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Vito Bologna v. United States

Vito BOLOGNA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Bologna v. United States, 287 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1961)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 14, 1961
Docket
No. 17133_1
Judges
Barnes, Jertberg, Koelsch, Per Curiam
Citations
287 F.2d 5591961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5110

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The above appeal from a judgment of conviction coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised, And the sole question on this appeal being whether Section 1407 of Title 18 U.S.C.A. is a narcotic law of the United States, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is affirmed, 181 F.Supp. 706 , upon the opinion of Judge Jacob Weinberger, rendered on defendant’s previously made motion to dismiss.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1962: 119622026peak 1962 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Richard Leigh Adams v. United States299 F.2d 327 (9th Cir. 1962)

Most recent

  1. Richard Leigh Adams v. United States299 F.2d 327 (9th Cir. 1962)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Bologna, 181 F. Supp. 706 (S.D. Cal. 1960) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list