National Labor Relations Board v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. GRUNWALD-MARX, INC., Respondent
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
We decline to enforce the board’s proposed order.
While one single isolated instance of a threat may be enough for an unfair labor practice under section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 158(a) (1), yet the vice president’s purported threat shows no course of conduct and in the frame of the events is such that we can only regard it as de minimis.
The weakness of the case is well illustrated by the hearing examiner's conclusion that there was no threat of reprisal or force or a promise of benefit and he found support in the dissent of one member of the board.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Tan, Inc.
- The J. S. Dillon & Sons Stores Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
- International Woodworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 3-10 v. National Labor Relations Board, Long Lake Lumber Company
- Lechmere, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
- Wah Chang Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
- Caribe General Electric, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Most recent
- Lechmere, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
- International Woodworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 3-10 v. National Labor Relations Board, Long Lake Lumber Company
- Caribe General Electric, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
- The J. S. Dillon & Sons Stores Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Tan, Inc.
- Wah Chang Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.