TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Virgil Wiseman v. Sinclair Refining Company

Virgil WISEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

Wiseman v. Sinclair Ref. Co., 290 F.2d 818 (2d Cir. 1961)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 25, 1961
Docket
No. 26779_1
Judges
Lumbard, Hincks, Moore
Citations
290 F.2d 8181961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4390

Opinion — Hincks

HINCKS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, claiming while a seaman on defendant’s vessel to have slipped on a greasy ladder step and to have knocked his ankle against its guard rail, brought this Jones Act action seeking damages for negligence and unseaworthiness as well as maintenance and cure. Trial was to the court without a jury. Only plaintiff and a physician who had examined him for testimonial purposes testified. The judge found for plaintiff in the amount of $21,000, “including all three matters.”

1

He made no independent findings of fact or conclusions of law, but asked plaintiff’s counsel to prepare them, declining the offer of defendant’s counsel also to submit findings. The findings so prepared were filed with the judgment but were not signed at that time.

The case must be reversed. The principal proof that plaintiff's back condition was related to his fall aboard defendant’s vessel was the physician’s testimony that sprains of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine were caused by a wrenching at the time of the accident.

2

After defendant’s counsel had established that the doctor made no inquiry *820 as to the previous history of plaintiff’s back, the trial judge barred counsel from asking whether it would be possible that the condition antedated the fall. This was error. The doctor also testified that the ulcer on plaintiff’s right leg was caused by the fall. After the doctor recognized a medical dictionary as a reliable authority on medical terms but noted that he was unfamiliar with its definition of an ulcer, defendant’s counsel was not allowed to ask the doctor if he agreed with the dictionary definition. This too was error, especially in view of the importance ■ of the physician’s testimony. Reilly v. Pinkus, 338 U.S. 269, 275 , 70 S.Ct. 110 , 94 L.Ed. 63 ; Abrams v. Gordon, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 276 F.2d 500 ; Lawrence v. Nutter, 4 Cir., 203 F.2d 540, 542-543 ; see Dolcin Corp. v. F. T. C., 94 U.S.App.D.C. 247 , 219 F.2d 742, 746-747 , certiorari denied 348 U.S. 981 , 75 S.Ct. 571 , 99 L.Ed. 763 ; but see Shaw v. Duncan, 10 Cir., 194 F.2d 779, 783 .

Plaintiff’s own testimony demonstrates his failure on several occasions in the course of his cure to seek medical attention and thus to keep the cost of his maintenance and cure to a minimum. Wilson v. United States, 2 Cir., 229 F.2d 277, 281 ; Repsholdt v. United States, 7 Cir., 205 F.2d 852, 856-857 , certiorari denied 346 U.S. 928 , 74 S.Ct. 308 , 98 L.Ed. 420 ; Bowers v. Seas Shipping Co., 4 Cir., 185 F.2d 352 -354; The Saguache, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 482 . The plaintiff also failed to offer credible evidence to support a substantial allowance for loss of future wages. He worked for the defendant only a fortnight and there is scant clue in the evidence whether his subsequent unemployment was caused by his injuries or by lack of available work or lack of desire to work. Since it is impossible, even with the aid of the unsigned findings, to know how much of the judgment represents maintenance and cure and loss of future earnings, the entire judgment must be vacated.

More basic ground for reversal is the absence of evidence of liability. Neither plaintiff nor any other witness testified that they ever saw grease on the stair. To be sure, plaintiff said on direct examination that the step was greasy. But on cross-examination he admitted that he did not see grease there at the time; that he only saw grease on his shoe. But where that grease came from does not appear.

Reversed and remanded with a direction to dismiss.

1

. Plaintiff’s counsel requested maintenance and cure in the amount of $5,762, damages of $16,800 for lost wages, and damages of $8,500 for pain and suffering, i. e., $30,972. Without explanation the court awarded $21,000, “including all three matters.”

2

. The plaintiff, after testifying that he injured his right leg on the fall, was asked on direct examination if any other part of his body was involved. He replied: “At that time it didn’t bother me, but X did have a wrenched back, but it didn’t bother me at that time.”

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1961: 11964: 11973: 21974: 11978: 21981: 11994: 119612026peak 1973 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Whitford A. Rice v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co.484 F.2d 1318 (2d Cir. 1973)
  2. Kalogeros v. Brasileiro446 F. Supp. 175 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)
  3. Moore-M v. Richardson295 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1961)
  4. N. v. Maatschappij Voor Industriele Waarden v. A. O. Smith Corporation and Armor Elevator Company, Inc.590 F.2d 415 (2d Cir. 1978)
  5. Saleh v. United States849 F. Supp. 886 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)
  6. Antonio Lipari v. Maritime Overseas Corporation493 F.2d 207 (3d Cir. 1974)

Most recent

  1. Saleh v. United States849 F. Supp. 886 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)
  2. Saleeby v. Kingsway Tankers, Inc.531 F. Supp. 879 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)
  3. N. v. Maatschappij Voor Industriele Waarden v. A. O. Smith Corporation and Armor Elevator Company, Inc.590 F.2d 415 (2d Cir. 1978)
  4. Kalogeros v. Brasileiro446 F. Supp. 175 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)
  5. Antonio Lipari v. Maritime Overseas Corporation493 F.2d 207 (3d Cir. 1974)
  6. Whitford A. Rice v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co.484 F.2d 1318 (2d Cir. 1973)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 10

DepthCaseCited by
Reilly v. Pinkus, 338 U.S. 269 (1949) 114
Wilson v. United States, 229 F.2d 277 (2d Cir. 1956) 27
Meyer v. United States, 112 F.2d 482 (2d Cir. 1940) 23
Dolcin Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 219 F.2d 742 (D.C. Cir. 1955) 22
Lawrence v. Nutter, 203 F.2d 540 (4th Cir. 1953) 20
Repsholdt v. United States (Two Cases), 205 F.2d 852 (7th Cir. 1953) 11
Bowers v. Seas Shipping Co., 185 F.2d 352 (4th Cir. 1950) 8
Shaw, Postmaster for Okla. City, Okl. v. Duncan, 194 F.2d 779 (10th Cir. 1952) 6
Hollenbeck v. Cranor, 346 U.S. 927 (1954) 6
Abrams v. Doctor Everett J. Gordon, 276 F.2d 500 (D.C. Cir. 1960) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list