Joseph De Luca v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury
Joseph DE LUCA, Appellant v. Robert B. ANDERSON, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al., Appellees
Subsequent history: vacated sub nom. Beard v. Stahr, 370 U.S. 41 (1962). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This is a civil service case, in which plaintiff-appellant seeks reinstatement to his former post in the Internal Revenue Service. We have considered the contentions advanced by appellant, but are satisfied he received all the procedural rights accorded him by statute and regulation. We find no error “cognizable within the scope of permissible review,” Hargett v. Summerfield, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 88 , 243 F.2d 29, 32 , certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 970 , 77 S.Ct. 1060 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 1137 (1957). The order of the District Court, granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment, will accordingly be Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 26 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.