TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Myrtle H. Barron v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of America

Myrtle H. BARRON, Appellee, v. Abraham A. RIBICOFF, as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of America, Appellant

Barron v. Ribicoff, 295 F.2d 432 (4th Cir. 1961)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 17, 1961
Docket
No. 8410_1
Judges
Soper, Bryan, Michie
Citations
295 F.2d 432

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is taken from a judgment of the District Court in an action brought under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S. C.A. § 405(g), to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying the claim of the appellee for the benefits of the statute on the ground that she was employed by her sister at the rate of Seven Dollars a week. The claim was rejected by the Referee appointed to hear the claim on the ground that the payments were made in an arrangement for the sharing of household expenses by the sisters and did not constitute wages paid by one to the other. The Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration declined to review the decision of the Referee and it thereupon became final. See 20 C.F.R. § 403.710 (e) and § 404.951. The District Judge was of the opinion that the findings of the Referee were erroneous and, accordingly, entered judgment for the appellee. There was, however, substantial evidence in support of the Referee’s findings and since Section 405(g) provides that the findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive the judgment of the District Court must be reversed.

Reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1961: 11965: 31966: 11968: 119612026peak 1965 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list